Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
There Is No Shame In Defending Yourself by IAmTheUnison There Is No Shame In Defending Yourself by IAmTheUnison
I feel a deep swell of pity for anybody so foolish as to disarm themselves before their enemies...and reality check, people! YOU ALWAYS HAVE ENEMIES!! Even if you don't know them yet. Such is the nature of the world we live in. There will always be those who seek to do you harm for whatever reasons they may have, and it is your responsibility and your responsibility alone to defend you and yours. Do not make the foolish error in judgement of thinking that someone else will defend you; for it is a very stupid person who blindly puts their safety in the hands of others; especially those who are pawns of a flawed and corrupt system such as what exists in this thing we call government.

The police are not your first line of defense. The military is not your first line of defense. YOU are your first line of defense. YOU are responsible for you, and the sooner all you weak-minded, weak-spirited spineless worms wake up and realize this the better off we'll all be...namely 'cause the rest of us will no longer have to endure your childish whining.

To be prepared for war is the most effective way to maintain peace. Gun Control DOES NOT keep law-abiding citizens safe. It DOES NOT keep guns out of the hands of criminals. It just makes gullible suckers more easy targets for those who don't give a damn about the laws, and the corrupt swine who abuse the laws for their own selfish ends. Keep your guns! Because nothing wards off criminals and tyrants like a bullet to the head.

And if you are one of those brainless sheeple too feeble-minded understand the importance of this infallible truth, then you had best prepare yourself to succumb to the effects of Darwinism. 
Add a Comment:
 
:icondunklematerie:
*I disagree to 100%* .

Many people undergo a burst of bloodrust and murderous rage from time to time because of... DUH... life happens.
And its very very good that there are no firearms available at that time.
Because when there is one available... 1 out of like 5 or 6 peole will grab one and go on "their mission", whatever that may be.

Anders Breivik. A radical christ as one of the more known and famous/infamous examples.

People are encouraged to kill others due to firearms because it makes killing way easier even compared to the most suitable knifes.
Sure you do not need knifes either. Crowbares, Baseballbats, Pocals, Bottles, Stones - whatever suits your methods.
But Guns are in a league of their own in terms of efficiency and this simple advantage in power makes killing much more attractive.


Also... the US people are not taking back Wallstreet and their own nation anyway.
They could kill all the securitys & cops, even those with advanced weaponry but yeah, who wants to kill someone to stop an idiot moneymonarchy to bring Marines everywhere on earth, just not back to their homes where they belong to?

True masterminds of evil and humandevaluing will never allow their puppets to even have the chance of resistance.
Lies and Laws will be fabricated to make the masses obey and belief.
Even insiderjob terror if it has to.
Because an unwilling puppet is a baaad puppet and is just trash anyways that must be disposed of quickly.


Bombard other cultures with firearms, bombard the own culture with media.
So that they may kill each other ( too many anyways ) in circumstances provoced by criminals far higher.
And those wont be shot because THOSE ARE MAKING THE LAWS and ... their lulz.
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner Jun 28, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
Reply
:icondunklematerie:
DunkleMaterie Featured By Owner Jun 28, 2015
Omg thanks for showing me this idiocy. WHO NEEDS KNIFES TO KILL?

You can use so many worktools and objects as weapons... man, why are Organizations so dumb?
I tell everyone how to end crimes. -> BY INVENTING A FAIR SYSTEM. :D

Crime is simply the possibility to gain something breaking the law of a system that is taking you from anyway in an unequal way.
In a system that is equal, there will be no greed or wealth related crimes and therefore 90% of all crimes wont even take place anymore.
But yeah... that was too simple... and way too utopic as US medias would say.
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner Jun 28, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer

WHO NEEDS KNIFES TO KILL?
anyone...almost everyone

You can use so many worktools and objects as weapons
true that one can use almost anything to kill someone.....
but you cant ban everything (according to gun haters)

I tell everyone how to end crimes. -> BY INVENTING A FAIR SYSTEM.

true...but not just practically possible
the human mind cannot be changed easily to discard problems like greed or envy or selfishness or such things...
so banning guns dont change much

Reply
:icondunklematerie:
DunkleMaterie Featured By Owner Jun 29, 2015
That why im saying: We should ban the system that regards profit higher as humans.

Jacque Fresco was a brilliant man to understand that but he lacked the ways to make the "plebians" understand it.
To my flaw I have to admit I am not brilliant enough to explain this to most other people.
I understand it so easily and I have yet trouble to comprehend why others dont.
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner Jun 29, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
it is easy to say that we must change the system....
but the fact is that this world has lots of people who would even sell their mothers to make profits...

in a society that is plagued by crime it is not wise to ban weapons that one can use to protect themselves..
criminals will always find a way to do harm...so all they are doing is to prevent ordinary people from defending themselves

on one side we can see governments who fight wars on drugs whereas the same govts funds or helps drug lords..
what you said is correct....improving the conditions of society will help bring down crimes but banning guns wont do any help
Reply
:icondunklematerie:
DunkleMaterie Featured By Owner Jun 29, 2015
Its understandable for the US. Founded on blood, hold on blood. No sarcasm or pun intended.
Such events are forming the mind. Something that is taken forcefully was not claimed just to be shared equally later on.

Still the way those dumb system runs have long past its zenith.

Oil runs out and with those the wasteful and idiotic ways the western world moves (literally).
The new found ressources below the Ukraine wont change that. The thing that got everything rolling around the Krim and the Putin is the next Devil story.
In truth its again just all an oily story of lies and greed.


In the end the gun topic alone doesnt bother me that much.
We have next to none in Germany and the crimerate is nearly nonexistent as well.
But hey voices from the US say our system is utopistic anyway and couldnt be copied 1 to 1 for the US.
In the end it could be done actually... but not if the government is pumping so much money into the military.
Of course then its impossible.

Oh yes... trying to do something forcefully is so~ smart when most problems arise just because of the stubborness of those idea in the first place.
Its 2015 and humanity is as dumb as ever.
For the pride and illusion of power exclusiv for a minority of narcistic idiots, the whole western world is struggling unnecessarily and completely for nothing else.
*sigh*

The more I learn about the people of the world I live in the less I wish I would have understood.
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner Jun 29, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
yep...americans always expected injun marauders to raid their stolen property or british to come back to claim the stolen colony and thats why they needed guns to form militias

yes germany is doing well and crime rate is low without gun ownership
switzerland is also doing well and crime rate is low even with gun ownership
that proves that crimes will fall if the society is doing pretty well regardless of gun ownership

britain on the other hand is seeing increase in crime even after ban on guns...it shows that british society is starting to rot
sweden and france also has increase in crime thanks to unchecked immigrants

trying to do something forcefully is so~ smart when most problems arise just because of the stubborness of those idea in the first place.
exactly...
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner May 7, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
lets say IF the guns are banned and the gun related violence has decreased....

THEN what if criminals start using knives instead of guns???? what next???ban all the knives then?????

:icongeniusmemeplz:
Reply
:iconbillwilsoncia:
BillWilsonCIA Featured By Owner Jun 19, 2015  New Deviant
Let's ban untensils and fast food restaurants for making people fat.

That's anti-gun logic if it was applied to combating obesity.
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner Jun 20, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
you said it

also ban television for making people dumb
Reply
:iconxvmage456:
XVmage456 Featured By Owner May 11, 2015
That's a stupid argument. Do you know why we invented firearms?
To kill people.
To hunt.
Why do we have knives?
As cutlery to eat.
Butchering meat.
Cutting rope (camping).
To chop food.
Don't tell me you use firearms for things other than killing humans/animals (target practice doesn't count, that's just practicing to kill something).
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner May 11, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
never seen anyone surrender to a firearm huh?? there aint no rule that everytime a firearm is drawn a person must be killed

every coin has 2 sides
To kill people - who try to attack youBring a Knife to a Gunfight 
To hunt - animals for sport and to protect people from maneaters and savage criminals

and so you say its humanly impossible to kill people with knives??? yet knife related violence outnumbers gun related violence whopping 5:1
thefederalist.com/2014/11/11/k…
hotair.com/greenroom/archives/…

if knife is harmless and is solely used for (As cutlery to eat.Butchering meat.Cutting rope (camping).To chop food.) ,then would people be calm and happy if you openly carry it in public??
and please do tell me who on earth other than you use knives like kukri, stilleto and switchblade for cutlery and camping???

Don't tell me you use firearms for things other than killing humans/animals (target practice doesn't count, that's just practicing to kill something).....  
never seen any people using guns in olympics??? who have never killed any human or animal in their lives ever????guess they must be practicing all their lives to kill humans effectively..
also enthusiasts collect firearms for hobby....and not to build up a huge arsenal to prepare for a zombie apocalypse
Reply
:iconxvmage456:
XVmage456 Featured By Owner May 12, 2015
I believe in the Olympics blank rounds would be used. You can't do much with a gun if you don't have live ammunition.

"and please do tell me who on earth other than you use knives like kukri, stilleto and switchblade for cutlery and camping???"
My mistake, I thought you meant all types of knives.

"who have never killed any human or animal in their lives ever????guess they must be practicing all their lives to kill humans effectively.."
Sorry but I don't understand what you said here. Can you please word it differently again in a reply?

"
and so you say its humanly impossible to kill people with knives???"
I didn't say that. I was simply stating that the main use of firearms is to kill, while knives are mainly used for other things a lot of the time.

I see you live in India. I don't know much so correct me if I'm wrong but I believe people in your country can only own a firearm if they have a genuine reason for doing so. That, I'm not against. It's when anyone can buy a firearm like in some states of the US, I believe.

Since I live in the UK, I know that if I walk out my door there's a very low chance of me getting shot or attacked. Firearms aren't so much a necessity in our country as not many criminals even have them. However, for other countries, I can't say anything about banning firearms completely as I don't know enough.
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner May 12, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
sorry...they dont use blank rounds to shoot targets..how can they mark the score if no projectile hit the target

Sorry but I don't understand what you said here. Can you please word it differently again in a reply?
pardon my bad english....what i meant was that participants in the olympic shooting games have never shot at any humans or animals ever....and that they are not excelling their skills in target practice for the purpose to hunt humans and animals more efficiently....you can see the same with archery games too...

well if knifes are used for other things...would anyone allow you to openly carry them into an airplane....or parliament...or even a shop??no

anyone call kill anyone with almost anything they find....you can use large stones or beer bottles or hammer or metal pipes etc etc....that doesnt mean govt should ban all of this to prevent murder....a firearm is the most effective weapon for defence as well as offence....there is no rule that every person that owns a firearm must or has killed someone...chances are if you point your firearm at an attacker ,he may run for his life without even trying to attack you....isnt that actually good?

yes i live in india and firearms are usually illegal for law abiding citizens and somehow legal for criminals..lol....what i meant was that its very difficult for a law abiding person to legally obtain a firearm ( he has to prove that his life is under threat or that his plantation is under attack from man eaters) whereas its pretty simple for a criminal to obtain one from black markets....which leaves the good guys defenseless.....moreover criminals use knifes and machetes if they dont find a  firearm...so banning firearms dont do anything to reduce crimes...it just leaves the innocent guys defenseless...

in some US states people are allowed to easily buy firearms due to old laws i think, to protect people which i believe when the place was usually marauded by raiders..
see in the US majority of deaths by guns are suicide...and then you can see kids on killing spree running around shooting in school...that is because of irresponsible parents not locking up guns....gun owners must be educated to take responsibility to safely lock their firearms instead of banning them....

i think the UK is filled with cctv...but i dont believ that it stops crime..it just help identify criminals...and seeing from these figure..i guess you were lucky so far
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic…
www.bbc.com/news/magazine-1873…
Reply
:iconxvmage456:
XVmage456 Featured By Owner May 13, 2015
The UK is about to be filled with even more CCTV. I think I just live in a less densely populated area so it's much more peaceful than everywhere else in the UK.

There doesn't seem to be many guns out here in the UK so everyone having guns isn't necessary. After asking my friend today, his opinion was that America should have gun control but it wouldn't work because there's already so many guns out there that only law abiding citizens would hand their guns in while the criminals keep them.

I agree that educating gun owners to keep and handle their weapons safely would be better but that should be a requirement by law before buying a gun, not just something that's encouraged. However, I still think that if they had gun control from the start when guns were no longer necessary, it would be much better because now it's too inconvenient to introduce gun control.

I think I might've been a little bit abusive and sarcastic in my first reply. If I have, sorry. My life hasn't been good recently and I've been getting angry at everyone.
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner May 13, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
cctv are surveilance devices and does not prevent crime....atleast people who are afraid of jail would avoid commiting crime in front of a cctv but the bad guys wont...
almost everyday in tv i can see a lot of radicals rioting in the streets of UK...is that true???

yup...gun control would only stop the legal flow of firearms.....just like drugs are banned but you can still get it....the law abiding good guys must be allowed to protect themselves....because any nation is capable of arresting criminals who attack defenseless people and send them to jail...but only nations that allow good guys to protect themselves can avoid such tragedy happening in the first place....as the old saying goes, prevention is always better than cure...aint no good to nobody if a family member is killed and the criminal is sent to jail...its wiser and better to avoid that death in the first place by allowing them to protect themselves..

yeah ..most guns owners in the US are irresponsible...only an absolute dumbass would allow their child to have access to their firearm...

personally i'm a gun enthusiast...and because our govt is against guns...i ended up collecting replicas and airsofts as hobby....i never intend to fire any weapon at nobody even if i had access to real weapons...

i can perfectly understand when someone is having a tough time in life.....but hey...atleast you didnt try the evasive trollish replies like most guys do.....i respect people who are reasonable..:) (Smile) 
Reply
:iconxvmage456:
XVmage456 Featured By Owner May 13, 2015
The radical protests are mainly in large cities, I haven't seen any where I live but there are sometimes protests from groups such as the anti-Islamic English Defence League. I might be going on a protest against our nuclear weapons as a lot of money is wasted on it and I don't really see much need for it. I can understand it would be different in India though because of tensions with Pakistan.

Thanks for accepting my apology, I have depression but because of our healthcare system, I've been waiting for 2 months now for therapy.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconcreeppingdeath:
CreeppingDeath Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2015  Student Digital Artist
nice!
Reply
:iconfujin777:
Fujin777 Featured By Owner Apr 14, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
Good point.
Reply
:iconiamtheunison:
IAmTheUnison Featured By Owner Apr 24, 2015  Professional Digital Artist
Thank you. :bow:
Reply
:iconfujin777:
Fujin777 Featured By Owner Apr 24, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
No problem at all.
Reply
:iconsoulessone12:
soulessone12 Featured By Owner Jan 23, 2015
good point point but i prefer to defend myself with a sword 
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner May 7, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
a katana??
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner May 7, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
isnt that he mans sword??
Reply
:iconsoulessone12:
soulessone12 Featured By Owner May 7, 2015
no, It's an Ulfbhert, it is a viking era sword and is consider one of the best to be forged in history, heck only the elites in viking society wielded one of these
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner May 7, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
awesome...

but i prefer this  cgcookie.com/blender/files/201…
Reply
:iconsoulessone12:
soulessone12 Featured By Owner May 7, 2015
good choice, except you need to have really good perception skills as all the weight in a lightsaber is in the hilt so you won't be able to "feel" the blades location.
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner May 7, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
but i believe the force is strong with me....

look on the bright side...you wont cut a criminal and worry that he hill bleed to death ruining your carpet in the process
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconsaradorie:
saradorie Featured By Owner May 4, 2014
Would anyone object to severe limitations on ammo to small caliber rounds for self defense, with everything else limited to gun ranges, police and military. Of course this idea will probably be rejected by those who believe that guns are needed to protect the people from government.
Reply
:iconnamezong:
namezong Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2014
Shameless criminals would dissagree with your message.
Reply
:iconnasa15:
Nasa15 Featured By Owner Apr 11, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Hurrah. We've got a natural born right to life, and that means defending that life with hot lead.
Reply
:iconzeonista:
Zeonista Featured By Owner Apr 2, 2014
Speaking of those rights that some people are ever demanding of God and man.... Here's the unspoken right of the Second Amendment. You have the Right not to be the victim of a violent crime, or live in fear of becoming such a victim. You have the Right to keep from being a victim by using a weapon to prevent that crime from happening. You have the Right to use firearms, because those are currently the most efficient weapons for that purpose.
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner May 7, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
well said
Reply
:iconzeonista:
Zeonista Featured By Owner May 8, 2015
Thank you! :) That comment has always been my version of the context behind the blunt but short language of the text. It didn't matter to the citizens of the Original Thirteen States if the person threatening them with violence was a career criminal "immigrant" from Newgate Prison, a home-grown offender, an Indian, a pirate, or a foreign soldier (including the Redcoats of George III). They were all threats to the aforementioned life liberty, and pursued happiness, and any American had the right to own weapons of any type and number to deal with them. If Quakers and Moravians did not wish to exercise that right due to religious conviction, that was their choice, to be respected but still be protected at large by their arms-bearing neighbors.
Reply
:iconmenapia:
menapia Featured By Owner Mar 6, 2014
Some countries actually had laws that made it compulsory for law abiding citizens to own a gun or rifle, the argument was that the nation that was genuinely in arms could defend itself and so could individuals citizens. 

The Boer republics back in the 19thC required All citizens to own a gun and keep at least 30 rounds of ammo on hand at all times in case of emergency or being called up to serve on Commando which worked like the old colonial militias.
Reply
:iconbortle:
bortle Featured By Owner Feb 3, 2014
Gun control will have no effect if societal factors that contribute so heavily to crime-namely, poverty, inequality and subsequent tension-go unaddressed.
Reply
:iconiamtheunison:
IAmTheUnison Featured By Owner Feb 4, 2014  Professional Digital Artist
And that's really the point that people like me try to make to the sheep of the world.
Reply
:iconbortle:
bortle Featured By Owner Feb 4, 2014
You can always point to the example of Switzerland, where people are mandated to possess firearms by law, yet the lack of societal disparity that would contribute so heavily to crime means that they pretty much never have to use them. Besides, in going after gun owners in broad strokes, people completely overlook that the area where any control would actually be sorely needed would be in providing background checks for the certifiably mentally ill.
Reply
:iconkyrtuck:
kyrtuck Featured By Owner Jan 12, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Ah, but can you say that ALL criminals are inherently, iredeemably evil?  Why should I end the life of some 19 year old over something like property loss?
Reply
:iconco85:
CO85 Featured By Owner Jan 14, 2014
It has nothing to do with property.  The moment someone invades your home or points a gun at you, your life is at risk.  Cooperation is no insurance that you will not be harmed.

Anyway this is all besides the point because there is no requirement you have to use a gun if you have it.  You can always chose not to draw and cooperate if you think that's the best option.  But being armed gives you a much higher chance of survival if resistance is necessary.
Reply
:iconkyrtuck:
kyrtuck Featured By Owner Jan 16, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
If the guy is a destitution-driven criminal like most of them, then yes, Cooperation is a very big insurance you won't get killed. It always astounds me the gun lovers act like all criminals are driven by Charles Manson-like sadism.
Reply
:iconf14ace:
f14ace Featured By Owner Apr 29, 2014
I don't give a damn why he's in my house.  There is no justification you can provide to defend breaking into someone's home and terrorizing them.  I have a right to defend myself and not be threatened by criminal thugs in my own home.  Also, you fail to realize that in the majority of cases where guns are used in self defense, the gun was never even fired because it's mere presence alone was enough to deter the criminal.
Reply
:iconkyrtuck:
kyrtuck Featured By Owner Apr 29, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
You sound like an easily frightened fellow. And oh "joy" more of that "just pointing a gun works" pixie dust!
Reply
:iconf14ace:
f14ace Featured By Owner Apr 29, 2014
Never mind.  After having read your other comments it is clear you have your head crammed up your ass and are not worth debating with.
Reply
:iconthe-conquerors:
The-Conquerors Featured By Owner Oct 14, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Don't all liberals do though? Have their head up their ass? ~ C
Reply
:iconf14ace:
f14ace Featured By Owner Oct 14, 2014
I refuse to call people like him liberals.  They don't deserve to be called liberals.  They're just left-wing fascists posing as liberals.  I prefer the term "moonbat".
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconkyrtuck:
kyrtuck Featured By Owner Apr 30, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Takes one to know one :thumbsup:
Reply
:iconco85:
CO85 Featured By Owner Jan 16, 2014
No, it's not any insurance you won't get harmed.  People can and do get harmed and/or killed without resisting.  You might get killed so you can't ID him later at trial, or he might shoot you accidentally.  As long as you had a gun pointed at you, you at risk, as most criminals are not too concerned with proper safe gun handling.

When you cooperate with a mugger, robber, etc, you are putting you're life in the hands of someone who clearly does not have your best interests in mind.  Altogether that's not a good situation to be in.  Complying may be the best option under the circumstances, but at the very least, it's reasonable to want the means to fight back in case your assailent decides to kill you or gives you a chance to exploit.  Criminals don't always keep full attention on their victims and if you act like you are a defenseless sheep you might get the chance to take the situation out of his hands and put it back in yours, like what happened in this case:


But for not to be possible, you need to have the proper means.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
December 14, 2013
Image Size
1.4 MB
Resolution
3072×1463
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
2,159 (2 today)
Favourites
86 (who?)
Comments
289
×