Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
December 14, 2013
Image Size
1.4 MB
Resolution
3072×1463
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
1,141 (1 today)
Favourites
59 (who?)
Comments
226
×
There Is No Shame In Defending Yourself by IAmTheUnison There Is No Shame In Defending Yourself by IAmTheUnison
I feel a deep swell of pity for anybody so foolish as to disarm themselves before their enemies...and reality check, people! YOU ALWAYS HAVE ENEMIES!! Even if you don't know them yet. Such is the nature of the world we live in. There will always be those who seek to do you harm for whatever reasons they may have, and it is your responsibility and your responsibility alone to defend you and yours. Do not make the foolish error in judgement of thinking that someone else will defend you; for it is a very stupid person who blindly puts their safety in the hands of others; especially those who are pawns of a flawed and corrupt system such as what exists in this thing we call government.

The police are not your first line of defense. The military is not your first line of defense. YOU are your first line of defense. YOU are responsible for you, and the sooner all you weak-minded, weak-spirited spineless worms wake up and realize this the better off we'll all be...namely 'cause the rest of us will no longer have to endure your childish whining.

To be prepared for war is the most effective way to maintain peace. Gun Control DOES NOT keep law-abiding citizens safe. It DOES NOT keep guns out of the hands of criminals. It just makes gullible suckers more easy targets for those who don't give a damn about the laws, and the corrupt swine who abuse the laws for their own selfish ends. Keep your guns! Because nothing wards off criminals and tyrants like a bullet to the head.

And if you are one of those brainless sheeple too feeble-minded understand the importance of this infallible truth, then you had best prepare yourself to succumb to the effects of Darwinism. 
Add a Comment:
 
:iconsaradorie:
saradorie Featured By Owner May 4, 2014
Would anyone object to severe limitations on ammo to small caliber rounds for self defense, with everything else limited to gun ranges, police and military. Of course this idea will probably be rejected by those who believe that guns are needed to protect the people from government.
Reply
:iconnamezong:
namezong Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2014
Shameless criminals would dissagree with your message.
Reply
:iconnasa15:
Nasa15 Featured By Owner Apr 11, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Hurrah. We've got a natural born right to life, and that means defending that life with hot lead.
Reply
:iconzeonista:
Zeonista Featured By Owner Apr 2, 2014
Speaking of those rights that some people are ever demanding of God and man.... Here's the unspoken right of the Second Amendment. You have the Right not to be the victim of a violent crime, or live in fear of becoming such a victim. You have the Right to keep from being a victim by using a weapon to prevent that crime from happening. You have the Right to use firearms, because those are currently the most efficient weapons for that purpose.
Reply
:iconmenapia:
menapia Featured By Owner Mar 6, 2014
Some countries actually had laws that made it compulsory for law abiding citizens to own a gun or rifle, the argument was that the nation that was genuinely in arms could defend itself and so could individuals citizens. 

The Boer republics back in the 19thC required All citizens to own a gun and keep at least 30 rounds of ammo on hand at all times in case of emergency or being called up to serve on Commando which worked like the old colonial militias.
Reply
:iconbortle:
bortle Featured By Owner Feb 3, 2014
Gun control will have no effect if societal factors that contribute so heavily to crime-namely, poverty, inequality and subsequent tension-go unaddressed.
Reply
:iconiamtheunison:
IAmTheUnison Featured By Owner Feb 4, 2014  Professional Digital Artist
And that's really the point that people like me try to make to the sheep of the world.
Reply
:iconbortle:
bortle Featured By Owner Feb 4, 2014
You can always point to the example of Switzerland, where people are mandated to possess firearms by law, yet the lack of societal disparity that would contribute so heavily to crime means that they pretty much never have to use them. Besides, in going after gun owners in broad strokes, people completely overlook that the area where any control would actually be sorely needed would be in providing background checks for the certifiably mentally ill.
Reply
:iconkyrtuck:
kyrtuck Featured By Owner Jan 12, 2014  Student Traditional Artist
Ah, but can you say that ALL criminals are inherently, iredeemably evil?  Why should I end the life of some 19 year old over something like property loss?
Reply
:iconco85:
CO85 Featured By Owner Jan 14, 2014
It has nothing to do with property.  The moment someone invades your home or points a gun at you, your life is at risk.  Cooperation is no insurance that you will not be harmed.

Anyway this is all besides the point because there is no requirement you have to use a gun if you have it.  You can always chose not to draw and cooperate if you think that's the best option.  But being armed gives you a much higher chance of survival if resistance is necessary.
Reply
Add a Comment: